>>>>Good afternoon Canada,
>>>>
>>>>Am I reading you correctly in that
>>>>(1) receiving a few inappropriate statements from X, combined with
>>>>(2) far outweighing the contributions of X
>>>>
>>>>is a free ticket to writing bad-mouthing letters about X to his/her employer
>>>
>>>IMO MVP status of all three is not relevant to this incident, but to the contributions of each.
>>____________
>>Eh Mike,
>>
>>Where did I mention MVP ?
>>
>>Is my interpretation of your message correct ?
>
>Obviously not. I don't condone writing the letters. You didn't raise the MVP issue, but that is all I was talking about originally.
>
>You conveniently omit (3) X hacking into Y's account.
_______________
Mike,

I did not 'conveniently' omit the hacking

I have written in a previous message - thought you had read it - that (1) I am not in favour of revokings anyone's mvp status, and (2) neither am I in favour of making anyone mvp as a result of this 'happening'. I think that this is commonly accepted here. But I'm not saying that I would mind should we have a few less mvps of that kind next year.

My point was that both mvp status and past contributions are not relevant here

The hacking - I've been reading here that there was no malice involved from Nadya's side, that no mails were sent under anothers name and that there was no havoc. Bloggin that on foxite is one thing. But to spread that on a 'for-profit' site - which is her home site I take it - is a bit too much imo

If one states that the (hacking)incident is closed as far as he's concerned and writes such a letter two months later - how would you call that ?

Apart from the lie, I find the letters - plural - the most common of the common, like stabbing someone in the back

I wouldn't do that to my worst enemy.

Can you, can any man imagine doing that just to take revenge and/or hurt someone ?

The letters were pure malice (A desire to harm others or to see others suffer)