Personally, I don't put too much value into anything other then a technical nature uttered by either of the Ks. Prior to this incident they never really stuck me as the type of people I'd like to spend time with.

And not with this incident occurring, I'm sure I would not be interested in anything either of them has to say about anything, as I don't think they can be trusted anymore.

>Perry,
>
>You and I may feel it has nothing to do with MVP status, but IMHO it looms large in the minds and motivations of certain MVPs.
>
>Examples:
>
>- One of the protagonists has declared that N's desire for MVP status (which she denied) is a terrible motive for answering questions in technical forums. Actually, it is a mechanism recommended by MS itself for people with that ambition.
>- MVP status has been waved in N's face three times online to my incomplete knowledge.
>- MVP status was sufficiently relevant to one of the protagonists that he added it to the bottom of his letter.
>
>Is that really what the award has been reduced to? There are consequences: I've seen it said four times on UT that the MVP award (in the VFP arena, anyway) is increasingly irrelevant. Shame- it used to be a lot more than that and there ought to be some recognition for the likes of Sergey B whose contributions never have been accompanied by grandstanding or in-groupism.