He won't answer anything head-on and directly, Perry. If he does answer this, it will be more of the same.

>Now you've peeked my interest. What leads you to believe it's all "hearsay and conjecture"? It appears to me that letters are valid, as there is motive based on the comments made.
>
>You might be able to question that Naomi did indeed get fired over the letters, as there has been no proof posted to that. But the letters kind of stand on their own anyways.
>
>>It makes no difference that it is MVPs. Pretty much everything that has been said in this and related threads is hearsay and conjecture.
>>
>>
>>>I'll take a position by saying I won't publically state my position. I have better things to do with my time.
>>>
>>>Craig, I'll ask one final question.
>>>
>>>If, instead of Andy/Marcia, this had been a different individual or individuals - maybe JB and myself, or maybe someone who wasn't a VFP MVP, or maybe someone you had previously debated online - but all other sequence of events would be the same. Would you still refrain from talking about this in the community, had it not been a VFP MVP?
>>>
>>>Kevin