>>Six hours ago I wrote this:
Re: Big brother - The sequel Thread #
1267866 Message #
1268616>>
>>Nicholas, reading your words I feel urged to restate it here:
>>
>>
Passive readers and Fox MVPs may be thinking now that it is only a minor group of people here on the Universal Thread who bother and continue to whine about it. But what I have seen is that these people have invested a lot of their spare time to bring to the attention all facts and arguments that they could think of, and their motives were sound.>>
>>Now here's a question to you specifically: Do you agree with this view?
>>
>
>Not completely.
Somewhat ambigeous answer here, but I guess this is another way of saying "Almost completely".
>Anyway an MVP is a technical advisor not a moral compass.
Yes I tend to agree with that 'definition'. However, there was also focus on the status, because it had become part of the issue since Andy used his status in that letter, thus impressing the head of the company. Do you think that this fact should not have been mentioned or should have been worked out in a different way?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
