Well said (as usual).

>Obviously you feel very personally invested in this. I wasn't thinking of you at all in regards to this whole issue. I was a just suggesting that if people were really interested in righting a wrong, helping Nadya find work would be a much more productive expenditure of time and resources than figuring out how to get Krameks stripped of their MVPs or otherwise sanctioned. I don't think organizing an MVP lynch mob or sending some kind of petition to MS ( yes, i know you didn't suggest any of that ) is the most important thing.
>
>I don't intend to get into a debate with you on this. If you are already doing what you think is right, good for you, go to it. I sincerely commend you for taking a stand on this and having a sense of justice. No attack on you is implied or intended.
>
>
>
>
>>Huh, this one I hadn't expected, not by you. I give you a compliment and get back a reply that indicates you think of me as someone who seeks revenge? Are you serious there?
>>
>>Do you really think I'm in this all for some vengeance? In that case, please consider the possibility that my idea - that certain MS employees should read these threads - is based on ethically sound motives.
>>
>>Another point: I'm one of those who have actually tried to help Naomi get back on track. However, those actions have been done in the private domain and the (wise) decision was made to not make them a part of the discussions here. Privacy and diplomacy are the keywords there.
>>
>>
>>>Personally, I'd rather see efforts focus on helping Nadya get back on track than seeking some kind of vengence.
>>>
>>>
>>>\
>>>>Charles, you do realize that you're just only one of a small pool of people kicking this around and around?
>>>>
>>>>No, seriously, you mentioned some very good facts and arguments here. This message can be added to the now huge number of messages in these threads that really ought to be seen by certain MS employees.