Well then, my public opinion is that I'm not going to state one side or the other.

>Craig,
>
>Who are you kidding? This sounds more like a George Bush type of imprecise, wishy-washy response.
>
>This isn't a court of law, it's a court of public opinion. The Krameks expressed their views on Naomi in many online public posts - why are they suddenly not talking about this on the same forums where they had so much to say earlier???
>
>You say, "fact, I have spoken to Marcia and Andy about this whole thing". And then you say, "in doubt, a letter has been posted". Craig, either they sent the letter(s) or they didn't. Did you even ask them that????? You say, 'in doubt'...what does that mean???? Are you implying anything????
>
>If someone accused me of writing a letter that I did not write, you better believe I'd be up here, fully loaded, blowing the doors off anyone who accused me. Have we seen anything like that here????? I tried to talk to the Krameks via email, to verify that they indeed sent the letter, and if so, why. While I received replies, I did not receive direct responses.
>
>You say, "Fact: My opinion will not change what happened. All it will do is cause bad feelings from one side of the issue and thanks from the other side". Is that what you're worried about??? This is really revealing.
>
>Sure, there's more than one side to a story. The Krameks have been asked to come up and tell their side of the story, on the very online site where they openly criticized Naomi. Yes, what Naomi did earlier was very, very wrong....but you know what? She came up here and apologized and explained. And I wish the Krameks would come up and at least explain their side. The longer we go with silence, the longer many will continue to form the opinion that there's no defense.