>Discretion has a value (and at least one person here who's been sounding off about MVP's silence has reason to value that discretion).
>
>I have no idea what you're talking about, but have you considered whether such comments reveal a double-standard? It seems that it is "open season" on the UT, its community and members with whom you disagree, at whom you have just delivered a widely-cast net of FUD; but absolute secrecy, privacy, privilege and manoevering behind the scenes for the advantage of a select few.
>
>QED.

You have no reason to know what I'm talking about with the parenthetical remark. One person does; whether that person realizes it, I can't say. I didn't mean to cast wide aspersions, just to point out that I've had the opportunity over the years, including recently, to be indiscreet, and chose not to.

I'm not sure why anyone here thinks they have the right to know what actions I took or didn't take regarding the Andy/Marcia/Naomi situation. I did the things that my conscience suggested were the right things to do. In some cases, my actions were effective; in others, they were not, but I made an effort. Why is is anyone else's business what those actions were?

Tamar