>>>I watched at in the IMAX cinema, and it was gorgeous even thou I was in first row (it was a pre-screening last week) The glasses are so good you completely forget about them. Of course, if it was not for the 3D, the movie was not very good
>>
>>I agree. In 2d you would have to be a fan of that kind of thing. But seeing the 3D was so much fun I would have watched pretty much anything.
>>
>>Surely somebody will start producing this kind of stuff for home theater, at least on DVD ( will be amazed if porn producers aren't the first )
>
>Actually, the technology for that exists already - I've seen the Descent game in 3d as early as 1995. The only trouble was that the goggles had to have a cable to the gadget. Nowadays it'd be a piece of cake to do wireless: just have a LCD for each eyepiece, one that goes black for odd half-images, the other goes black for even ones. So you'd have, at refresh rate of 70Hz, 35 left and 35 right images. More than enough for all the 3d you want.

I've been waiting for this technonogy to "get with it" for years. To date, they still can't make it do a decent resolution at an affordable price. If someone could, imagine the possibilities that a wearable monitor could bring. I'd like to be able to plug in my "glasses" to be able to eliminate my computer monitor and TV. Just imagine if a standard interface could be made where those "glasses" could then be plugged into your PDA, Portable DVD player, notebook, cell phone or anything where the display is currently too small. My friend boasts about being able to watch a full length movie on his PDA. That may be cool to some, but I'm not interested in watching a movie on a three inch screen. That's a step backwards in my opinion.