Hi Jim
I do agree that what Naomi did was wrong on all levels.

IMO the real crux of the matter is this: Naiomi apologized and Andy said he saw this ordeal as case closed.

If Andy said it was case closed then it should have remained closed.


If Andy really had an issue with the original break in he should have reported it then. To me it seems that the attempt to break into another persons account is a much more severe issue than posting messages during the work day.

What Andy and Marcia did was also wrong on all levels. It was petty vindictive scoolyard behavior that caused real damage to someone.














>This is really gettng to me now. I have been silent about this issue but I can't take this anymore. How does Andy standing up for his dignity and making the obviously dishonest and potential illegal actions of NN show a level of dishonor? Andy did not steal someones identity and act as them in a public forum. Andy did not commit any illegal acts at all.
>
>In your post you suggest that Andy is somehow dishonrable because he wrote a letter telling the absolute truth about someones actions but that person (NN) who violated laws and committed an obviously illegal and unethical action is somehow honorable. You say because Andy wrote a letter that said nothing that was not true should not receive an MVP but Naomi who committed fraud should be given and MVP? How can you justify that position? How can you ignore the actions that Naomi committed?
>
>IMO, the actions that Naomi committed has reduced her to drivel in my eyes. There is nothing she can do or say at this point that would cause me to think of her as anything but a dishonest and dishonorable person. I will not have anything else to say about this but I just could not remain quiet while you go on and indicate that Andy is somehow dishonorable in any fashion of this situation. What Andy decides to do about what Naomi did to him is purely up to him and don't see that anything Andy has done indicates him being dishonorable at all.