>>It was not considered "wrong" that time.
>>Sure, we can do "something about the present". The question is whether still remaining native Americans agree, or regardless we continue do "wrong" or "right" based on the current moral principals.
>
>I bet it felt wrong to the indians. You're making no sense. We are the indians in the present scenario. It would have been "right" back then to keep out the English. Got anything better than skewed logic? Didn't think so.

Good to learn that you seem to understand that there is often two sides of the same story, and that they conflict with each other. Wouldn't it be proper to talk trying to reach a mutual agreement and compromise instead of putting labels "wrong" on the opponent ideas, and "right" on your own ideas, and forcefully promote the "right" ideas?