>>>It was not considered "wrong" that time.
>>>Sure, we can do "something about the present". The question is whether still remaining native Americans agree, or regardless we continue do "wrong" or "right" based on the current moral principals.
>>
>>I bet it felt wrong to the indians. You're making no sense. We are the indians in the present scenario. It would have been "right" back then to keep out the English. Got anything better than skewed logic? Didn't think so.
>
>Good to learn that you seem to understand that there is often two sides of the same story, and that they conflict with each other. Wouldn't it be proper to talk trying to reach a mutual agreement and compromise instead of putting labels "wrong" on the opponent ideas, and "right" on your own ideas, and forcefully promote the "right" ideas?

Funny how you didn't even bother to address the "logic" of your previous post.

But, there is right and wrong. And there are varying degrees inbetween. I believe one way, you another. So be it. I'm not the one having an issue with you having an opinion. I just believe your opinion is wrong. There doesn't always need to be agreement and compromise. I feel like I'm having a discussion with a girlfriend over something I said years before that she disagreed with.