>>>>>>>>IMHO, maybe this is the most nonsense decision maded by this group of people..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Come on, Claudio... I'm sure that somewhere deep inside you will find a bit of humour. Besides, this way we might even bump into some people, I've made my choice... :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>hehe, I'm very, very humour guy.. a lot.. even that campaign was taken by me as a sort of humor stuff.. but, this one was taken pretty serious by most of all.. they're not kidding.. This is my point.. this is why I'm so amazed!! they are doing seriously!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>start with a rumor of someone that lost the job from someone that stole the other one info. and the other one is now THE ONE in the company <g>
>>>>>
>>>>>It's not a rumor. Somebody lost their job.
>>>>
>>>>not because their info. was publ. here.. lost for others reasons..
>>>>
>>>>huummmm, my point is about that I can't blame on UT, just because a client of mine has quit of my services.. sounds fully nonsense!
>>>>
>>>>even if I give you now 5 client's names (of mine now, with phone, etc) and telling you "go and take this clients to you!!"..
>>>>
>>>>The probability is almost zero..
>>>
>>>
>>>I've got a feeling that I'm not getting you at all, but...
>>>Who blamed UT? And what of?
>>>Someone lost their job, not a client. And UT is not being blamed, but the people who caused this person to lose the job. The flags are a sort of "joke", or movement, implying that noone wants to be easily identified in their addresses.
>>>
>>>But if you want to send me 5 clients of yours information, go ahead, wanna try it? :) :) :)
>>
>>so a missing communication is running down here on many minds..
>>
>>you're telling me, all of this is about a joke.. others said me this is seriously..
>>
>>huummm, know what.. thinking better, in both cases still sounds weird and not funny.
>
>I think you make be missing something in your interpretation.

that's right! this is what I'm trying to do.. understand!!

our forum is based on serious professional/personals links.. or used to be.. our relationships always was based on thrustable informations.. This is the reason that I'm still asking?