Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Pickton Found Guilty
Message
De
11/12/2007 16:21:59
 
 
À
11/12/2007 07:42:15
Information générale
Forum:
News
Catégorie:
National
Divers
Thread ID:
01274314
Message ID:
01274945
Vues:
11
>>>>That typically occurs in the U.S. when the prosecution doesn't think they have a strong enough case to prove 1st degree murder. Did the prosecution go for 1st degree murder and the judge gave the jury the option to find him guilty of 1st degree or 2nd degree murder?
>>>
>>>Yes and yes. I still can't fathom how you can find a man guilty of being a serial killer (he was found guilty of 6 murders so far and there are still a lot more to go) and come to the conclusion that he didn't plan any of them. They were all 'spur of the moment'? Seems inane to me.
>>
>>One possibility: they were crimes of opportunity. Maybe he invited hundreds of women to "party" at his farm, over a period of years, but only killed those drunk or stoned enough to be completely helpless.
>>
>>Another possibility, based on a Pickton quote: "I know I was brought into this world to be hear (sic) today to change this world of there (sic) evil ways," . . . Perhaps after interviewing a given woman over a period of time he may have decided that she was evil and should be murdered. Other women may not have met the "standard" and may have been spared. It's a very fine line but it could be argued that in either of these cases there was not premeditation.
>>
>>Bear in mind that any serial murderer is not going to be considered "sane". Both of the above arguments are (IMO :)) rational; Pickton's real motives may not be rational at all.
>
>I hear what you're saying, but if we accept that his purpose was to rid the world of women evil enough to have to be killed, then that in itself is, to me, premeditation. It may not be premeditation in the case of individual women, but it's surely premeditation in it's purpose.
>
>I just don't feel that a guy could be a serial killer without any premeditation in any of the killings. By the time he gets to number 5, say, I figure he must know what his intentions are.

I *think* the main issue is that virtually all of the evidence was "circumstantial". I believe the jury felt that First Degree was simply not 'proven' beyond a shadow of a doubt.

cheers
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform