Whaaaat??? How in the world could it even be remotely unethical to want to defend myself and
my family?????

Honestly, you gun control fanatics are WAY WAY WAY over the top. I'd like to see your position
after some thug attacks you or your family.







>Is THIS your argument? I'm really surprised here. It means you're as bad as that criminal, in the ethical sense.
>
>>Because I want to be armed at least as same as the criminal. The gun is the great equalizer.
>>
>>
>>>How about before Cain & Able? <g>
>>>
>>>The above question was not serious. Here is the serious one: How about a weapon that can be of use to temporarilly disable a criminal?! Why is this focus on a gun that sends a killing bullet? We might allow people to carry a weapon that has a less severe impact.
>>>
>>>>Your whole argument is premised on the assumption that if there were no guns, there would
>>>>be no murders, or even less murders. Well here's a historical factoid for you: People have
>>>>been killing each other since Cain & Able. It has always been, and always will be. Guns
>>>>are just the tool of the trade that criminals today choose to use. If you take them all
>>>>aways, they'll just pick up a baseball bat or knife. Do we ban all them too?