>>Of course, and not a Freudian one. :)
>>
>>I am personally very disappointed by the silence from Andy and Marcia regarding this. No public explanation, despite attempts to get some feedback or justification from them. They seemed to be quite enthusiastic in broadcasting their views on Naomi back in June....
>
>I recall you asked them to comment and received one reply from them. You have previously stated openly that this reply was disappointing, without giving further details of the reply. I'm inclined to believe you, but I prefer to judge for myself whether your disappointment is justified or not. And I can only tell after Í've read the reply myself.
>
>Hopefully you have used words in your initial email that make clear enough you seek contact on behalf of the community, because then it can be expected that at least certain contents of the emails may, one day or another, become published to that same community.
>
>Whatever, don't worry about copyright. That's all nonsense. Copyright is about the protection of creative ideas only. The only real concerns are privacy and personal relationship.

So basically you are trying to get Kevin to post his personal conversations? Nice.