>>>Duality achieved mathematically. Hasn't happened yet.
>>
>>I see the duality between an interesting way to write yet another linear screen saver (scrolling, at that) and the philosophical idea it was supposed to support.
>
>
>
>Are you saying that:
>
>1. you understand the paper's thesis and

Partially - you lost me when it became interesting, i.e. when Leibniz's stuff was about to be explained, introduced or in whichever manner passed on to the uninitiated,

>2. feel it has been achieved as a screen savers

...instead of that I got piece of code which was quite interesting to read and to figure out how would it work (without actually running it - that would be too simple!), but I couldn't connect that to any duality... between what exactly? Mind and matter? Mind and reality?