Thanks Hugo.

I'm becoming more convinced that the report was incorrect. It *may* have actually said 48inch LCD, but even then...

cheers

>>So said a NBC News story last night about green/conservation.
>>
>>Does this sound right to you?... Certainly doesn't to me (but I'm often wrong on this kind of stuff).
>>
>>cheers
>
>Jim,
>
>I googled and find this calculator (I did not download it, but it starts saying: With decreased power requirements and falling prices, desktop LCD monitors can prove more cost effective than traditional CRTs.)
>
>http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=5&threadID=173226&start=0
>
>Also found this chart that looks interesting but only compares LCD, Plasma and Rear Projection
>
>http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-6475_7-6400401-3.html