>Not yet having fully graduated to VFP 9 (we have one app in 9 and everything else in 8) I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for the update.
>
>I also tried to edit my post to remove the reference because I realized (too late as usual) that his "DISPLAY STATUS" would have shown the FOR clause (at least it does in VFP 8).
>
>Twice wrong in one post.......I'm getting better, that's not even a record

See http://www.code-magazine.com/article.aspx?quickid=0404022&page=3