>>Which just shows a musical-chairs like exchange of velocity vectors, where everybody gets everybody else's vector at least once, in a round robin fashion (or maybe not - are the objects in a collection always traversed in the same order?).
>>
>>There's not a shred of neural network here. Just some shredded nerve ;).
>
>But at first glance, it sure did look good, didn't it?
>
>Mike's a smart guy, but I haven't seen anything mind blowing from his writings and concepts. Though I do think it's cool that he at least tries to do more that watch television every night.

Oh sure - I know him personally, we met on the last of the first series of Whilfests. The above is called peer review, though I'd much more prefer beer review, he's good company too. Our last chat was quite interesting.