Giving that there is sugar ethanol I wouldn't buy the producer's libby agenda to restrict sugar ethanol agenda.

It would be great that you like in a place wehere horseshoes were the main industry. You will be fierly opposed to those damn new Charriots without horses......


>Maybe you should live in an area that benefits from corn ethanol before you make an unfounded blanket statement.
>
>>That's the whole issue.....who would drive the policies? consumers or producer's lobbies?
>>
>>In the long run, I think that every country shoul specialize producing what they can do better than any other, so while we export gold you can export software, let´s say.
>>
>>Corn etahnol is a bad idea, in every sense.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Brings to mind the phrase "damned if you, damned if you don't" :o)
>>>
>>>
>>>>>I'd say that the U.S. is doing more than its share supporting products made in Peru (as one example):
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/product/enduse/imports/c3330.html
>>>>>
>>>>>That is hardly closing the economy to cheaper foreign goods.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you think that the best think for the american people is that your government closes their economy to cheaper foreign goods , you are in good company along with Castro and Chavez......hey, why not every country closes their borders to any foreign good and tries to be self supplied for any good produced inside their borders? Sure that would make this global economy work better :)
>>>>
>>>>I'd say that you are supporting your consumers. I'm a proponent of unilateral open borders here, even without FTA's, ala Hong Kong.
>>>>I can't wait to buy USA goods at their normal price here.