>>>>Yeah, there is just one problem, the energy efficiency of corn ethanol is negative.
>>>>Also, while sugar ethanol could be produced more efficiently outside USA, there are lots of countries which are not terrorist homes or extremists tiranies that can produce sugar ethanol.
>>>>If the goal is to achieve independence of foreign supplies, you better start building more nuclear plants or drill Alaska more intensively.
>>>
>>>There's a simpler way: ban SUVs and home trucks, or at least revoke the tax incentives for them and tax them like large cars, which they basically are. Want to have a truck? Prove that you are doing business with it that can't be served by a car, or pay lots of taxes. Want to have a home tank? Prove that you're an army.
>>
>>Less freedom of choice is not a solution, its government control which is the antithesis of freedom.
>>
>>There's something on the order of 1.7 trillion barrels worth of oil shale in the US. It can be profitably extracted when oil is above $70 a barrel and with the advancement of technology it is expected to reduce that margin to $30 a barrel within 10 years. That's an actual solution.
>
>Not everyone thinks so - http://www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net/Index.html

The problem with the peak oil theory is it assumes we've already peaked.