>Happy New Year.
>
>If you want your hypothesis to be accepted, aren't you supposed to perform and document a series of relevant falsification attempts whose failure is presented in support of your hypothesis?

Once you have a hypothesis, yes.


>If an idea is built using assumptions/ideas that cannot be tested, then surely it fails the scientific method.

The scientific method has more steps than hypothesis and experiment.

The hypothesis must come from somewhere. It is made from proto-hypothesis ideas.

What I'm advocating is a new approach to develop a whole new class of hypotheses.

I haven't offered a hypothesis yet.

I think the expertise required to do so is more than any one person possess.

I think a team of programmers, neuroscientists and atomic physicists to get to the hypothesis stage of the scientific method.

I need some support for that to come together.