Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Buffering Architecture
Message
De
16/01/2008 08:56:02
Jay Johengen
Altamahaw-Ossipee, Caroline du Nord, États-Unis
 
 
À
16/01/2008 08:46:15
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivie
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Versions des environnements
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 8 SP1
Divers
Thread ID:
01282147
Message ID:
01282167
Vues:
10
>All your forms should be based on the same form class. Data buffering, saving and un-doing changes, should be part of this class.

How difficult is it to convert a form to use another base form?

>Your class hierarchy might look like this (parent on left, children on the right):
>
>
>Form
>|
>|--- cForm
>     |
>     |--- cDataForm
>     |--- other forms, including dialogs, reporting forms, ...
>
>
>I.e., all your forms ultimately derive from a class cForm; forms that need to manipulate data derive from cDataForm.

I think I need a bit more explanation on this part. Forms that don't use data, and those that do, are based from the one cForm? And if there are forms that use data, then those would be based from the cDataForm?

>This data form typically has methods to:
>
  • Check if there are changes to the current record (using GetFldState()
    >
  • Save changes
    >
  • Undo changes
    >
  • Go to: next record, previous record, first record, last record
    >
  • Ask for permission to go to another record or close form. This method - which might be called .CanChange() or something - will be invoked by .NextRecord(), .PreviousRecord(), etc. It will also be invoked in .QueryUnload(), if the user tries to close the form.

    Would you build navigation and add/edit/save/cancel buttons into this form, or just have methods available and design another class to do the visual stuff?
  • Précédent
    Suivant
    Répondre
    Fil
    Voir

    Click here to load this message in the networking platform