[TWIT FILTER OFF]

I haven't read many of your posts because you've been on my twit filter for a year or so, but - and I apologize to all women here - you are such a girl. I would guess that part of the reason that Nadya is where she is is because of people not telling her straight up what she needs to do. And then letting her do it. I'm sorry, I didn't mean for this to be about Nadya. It's really about you acting like a girl.

[TWIT FITLER ON]


>It looks now like we're getting into a touchy situation. Perhaps Mike was right but to me it does'nt look like it in this thread. I don't think enough informations were provided by Naomi to let us think that she really deserved the reply she got from Mike.
>
>I assume that you have more information than many of us have over here. So perhaps YOU can say that Mike is right. Can you say that because of private conversations you had with Naomi? If that's the case don't you think that it should remain private?
>
>It's not like talking about trivial discussions like which technology is better. When dealing with people I think you should be more careful. Private is Private it's not just a matter of wanting to be right at all price.
>
>To me it looks a bit like that. It looks like you're saying "Yes Mike is right because I know so and don't push me because I'll tell all".
>
>
>
>>Mike, you should not have written this all here. First, you're misinterpreting Naomi's words. Second, it's off-topic and esp. in this thread that's inappropriate. Third, these words are not for the public forum.
>>
>>Bull...
>>
>>Mike's comments are dead-on - there is zero misinterpretation.