>>>>>>So you didn't even TRY it? Before posting it I spent at least 30 minutes to translate the documentation method. The least you could have done is try it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh well, I will have to let it go. Pearls for the swines. <s>
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't use your solution and you insult me? And you're supposed to be the nice guy. Peter, you have some issues of your own. You should not take things like this personally. You proposed a solution, then beg me to try it, then when I don't, you whine and pout and insult me. Do you know how many ideas others put out there for different things I post? You are the only one who thinks it's a personal slight if yours is not selected. Grow up.
>>>>
>>>>I assume you would not have written this if I hadn't written 'pearls for the swines'. So, there are two questions for you.
>>>>
>>>>1) What would have been your reaction if I had not written that last sentence?
>>>>
>>>>2) Don't you agree that saying 'pearls for the swines' is giving a signal, rather than making an insult?
>>>
>>>Peter, why must you over analyze everything? Who cares how I would have responded without the "swines" comment? You address nothing of what I said, but rather try to turn it away. I DON'T FREAKING CARE! You are now twitted.
>>
>>Now I feel offended. Jay, you're a looser. Meaning, you loose more and more friends by acting this way. Oh well, I guess I'm now talking to a wall. I wish you the best and won't twit you. I twit nobody. Twitting is for loosers, for people who don't care to loose contact with other people.
>
>So now if somebody twits you, they are a loser? Nice.

So it's loser, not looser. And after checking: It's losing, not loosing. Okay, thanks for the correction.

To answer your question: Yes, that someone loses my friendship. But don't take it harsh, I do not seriously mean it. I'm willing to take it back the minute someone says it's offending.