>>>>>Peter, why must you over analyze everything? Who cares how I would have responded without the "swines" comment? You address nothing of what I said, but rather try to turn it away. I DON'T FREAKING CARE! You are now twitted.
>>>>
>>>>Now I feel offended. Jay, you're a looser. Meaning, you loose more and more friends by acting this way. Oh well, I guess I'm now talking to a wall. I wish you the best and won't twit you. I twit nobody. Twitting is for loosers, for people who don't care to loose contact with other people.
>>>
>>>So now if somebody twits you, they are a loser? Nice.
>>
>>So it's loser, not looser. And after checking: It's losing, not loosing. Okay, thanks for the correction.
>>
>>To answer your question: Yes, that someone loses my friendship. But don't take it harsh, I do not seriously mean it. I'm willing to take it back the minute someone says it's offending.
>
>Must be a culural difference. If you call somebody a "loser" it's just an insult. If you call somebody a "loser of my friendship" it has different meaning.

Not a different culture. Same in my country. It was a word game. And let me be clear: I was definitely offending Jay there. But let also be clear that it was the very first time I did this on purpose.

Here's another one for Jay (perhaps you can email him <g>): He's a loser because he apparently lost the discussion and stepped out by twitting me rather than saying sorry.