Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
RoboCopy vs. XCOPY
Message
From
21/01/2008 16:17:09
 
 
To
21/01/2008 15:21:13
Al Doman (Online)
M3 Enterprises Inc.
North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Other
Environment versions
Visual FoxPro:
VFP 9 SP1
OS:
Windows Server 2003
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01283787
Message ID:
01283826
Views:
11
I agree with the recommendation. I use it because of it's fault tolerance. It works easy and fine.

>Some of you may be using XCOPY for backups, synchronizing/mirroring directory trees etc. If so, consider using the free Microsoft utility RoboCopy (Robust Copy) instead. It's available in the Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit Tools, but can also be installed on Windows XP (maybe other versions of Windows as well):
>
>http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9D467A69-57FF-4AE7-96EE-B18C4790CFFD&displaylang=en
>
>It comes built-in to Windows Vista.
>
>Things I like about it:
>
>- can handle directory paths over 260 total characters
>- gives by default a much more verbose progress report while running e.g. reporting %complete of individual files etc.
>- based on a single test mirroring two 5GB directory trees, seems significantly faster than XCOPY
>- while I haven't looked deeply into them yet, offers some quite advanced options e.g. improved fault tolerance
>
>Highly recommended.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform