I agree, quality is more important. Let's say you had 24 pages with the quality every bit as good as FPA or FoxTalk in their prime. What you you be willing to pay for a one year subscription?

Your premise is flawed. FPA and FT in their "prime" were part of an environment where you had four-figure attendance for major conferences and a new version every year or so (with new and interesting things to write and talk about).

Those days are gone (it's a major effort just to get more than 100 people to come to a major Fox event) - I think it's unreasonable to believe that a group (however bright and clever) could publish a monthly (or even bi-monthly) journal of 24 pages on the topic and keep it interesting. There just isn't that much new content to talk about.