>>Thanks for the reply Sergey. I am glad to hear that it works the same way as regular varbinary, does that mean there are no performance issues with varbinary(max)? (that you are aware of).
>
>Hi Einar,
>
>If value for varbinary(max) can be stored(fit) in the row than it'll be the same as regular varbinary. Otherwise it'll be stored separately with 16-byte pointer to it in the record.

Thanks for the reply Sergey.