>>It is worth testing again, since they did change the code since VFP 3. Originally, RAND() returned neither 0 nor 1, which was a problem. In VFP 5, they modified it so that it returns 1, but not 0.
>>
>>Tamar
>
>Shouldn't that be the other way round? - i.e., 0 <= x < 1

Yep, misread the paragraph in HackFox when I was writing that.

Tamar