>>>>This is another argument to get rid of the twit filter. It's an absurd invention from the UT.
>>>
>>>While I have never used a twit filter, I assure you it's not a UT invention. Similar mechanisms exist in many online venues.
>>
>>Not in all that I have visited sofar, AFAIK. But sure, prove that there's a black swan somewhere and the proposition that all swans are white has been falsified.
>>
>>Perhaps someone can point to such an other online venue. Then we can compare their functional design of the filter with the one that's implemented here.
>
>Pretty much all newsgroup readers support twit filters. I think, though, that the name will be something else. Looks like Agent, which I use, calls them "kill filters."
The places I visit have the option to ban someone from the own weblog. Can you point to a newsgroup?
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
