>>>>>>Yet another approach would be for all of us to try a bit harder to get along and be respectful of others' points of view. That doesn't mean agreeing, it just means being respectful of their opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>>Another approach would be for people who are twitted to look at the behavior that got them twitted and take accountability for those actions, instead of whining about it non-stop.
>>>>
>>>>You are suggesting here that it's always the fault of the twitted person. Which is ridiculous and illogical if that's all you can say about it.
>>>
>>>Peter, I'm not even going to argue with you. It is pointless.
>>
>>Rather than say to Mike that you agree and eventually also write that some can better take accountability for having been twitted, you 'forget' to agree and only talk about that other notion. Mike was trying to get emphasis on respect and your reaction undermined that attempt. It's your negative attitude. You're only interested in being respected by certain others and you don't mind being disrespectful to the rest.
>
>Peter, you are correct. I am interested in being respected by normal people. I am not interested in being respected by people like you.
Insulting.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
