General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Environment versions
Network:
Windows 2000 Server
Hi Tamar,
Thank you for your input.
1. I agree with the "No code in Click" and "No direct call to" conventions. I inherited this code and it is as it is, right, wrong and so on. Where it warrants, we're factoring things out. Moreover, we're going to be creating a completely new version from where we'll start over again with coding standards and best-practice. Until then, it is as it is. :-)
2. Thank you for pointing out the argument. I get tunnel vision and fail to read all that is there to read. I will look at the documentation on BINDEVENT and look for how it applies.
3. I discovered the REAL thing that was going on (I think). In earlier posts I thought I was observing VFP trying to handle multiple threads. Further investigation shows that the GPF was not happening because of threading but because of potentially stepping beyond the nested-iteration threshhold in VFP. I have looked at the logs produced at error-time and I noted hundreds of "GOTFOCUS" entries, which leads me to think VFP in production was complaining the only way it could: GPF.
Again -- thank you all for your kind responses and help! It is very much appreciated.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only