>>>>Dennis Kucinich dropping presidential bid
>>>
>>>The way I understand it it is to concentrate energies/money to his re-election for Congress where he has way better chances. Makes sense to me. Then again, some of the things he said in the debates also made sense to me.
>>
>>I think he did what he possibly could, just like John Edwards. I mean, you can get only so far saying things the corporate media don't want to hear. So you get to be the third candidate who gets a honorable mention after about 90 minutes of speaking of the top two, and when their soundbites were repeated at least six times.
>>
>>Which makes Kucinich (aka Kučinić) with Edwards the couple I'd like to see in the White house. They can toss a coin as to who gets to be vice.
>
>
>I can't believe you like Edwards. He is even phonier than Romney.

I`d really like to know the basis of your opinion regarding John Edwards (and Mitt Romney, for that matter).

Doubting that you`ve met either face to face, or even been at one of their 'events', I've gotta guess it comes directly from the media.
If that is the case it may be worth asking yourself just how much influence does big media have on the hearts and minds of the voting public at large.

Edwards has no ties to corporate donators (believe me, they would have been dug up by now) and has been singing the same tune from day 1 to now. How does that add up to "phoney"?