>>Because I had the similar question recently
>>Re: SQL Server 2005 & SQL Server 2000 Thread #1277402
>
>OK, but that thread was a month ago ... and you got your answer. I still don't understand why that explains why you replied to this more than 5-year-old post?!?!
>
>~~Bonnie

Why not if the problem was similar? Just found it interesting that 5 years later we're having the same types of questions.