Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Significance of SC primary
Message
De
28/01/2008 11:07:26
 
 
À
28/01/2008 10:38:36
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01285952
Message ID:
01286145
Vues:
24
One thing that is sad, but to be expected, is how voters will change over the course of the primaries. Very often a voter will prefer a candidate over the others, but he will not see his choice as having a chance of winning so instead of voting for his choice, he will pick out of the candidates he sees as having a viable chance of winning. As Obama gains more ground, you may see a lot of Edwards voters splitting between Clinton and Obama and virtually knocking Edwards completely out of the race.


>Oh. So the analysis I read last nite that said SC showed some probs with Obama because he got 80% of the black vote, but only 40% of the white was correct? Thanks.
>
>>It is not really representative of the rest of the U.S. What is signifant though is the number of voters turning out and how they voted.
>>
>>After writing that, we must remember that Jessie Jackson won the SC primary twice (84 and 88)...
>>
>>
>>>From those who live in this area, or follow primaries closely, how much significance is there to the total votes in the SC primary?:
>>>
>>>http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/01/obama-beat-mcca.html
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform