Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Significance of SC primary
Message
De
28/01/2008 15:35:29
 
 
À
28/01/2008 14:03:59
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01285952
Message ID:
01286336
Vues:
41
The same here with Edwards. Edwards did almost nothing for North Carolina. He focused on cabinets where he would have optimum visibility and anything to further his electability down the road. I did agree with many of his votes while he served, but there was just too much posturing and hand shakes going on.


>>Yes, I agree. Personally I would have liked Richardson better but he doesn't have the marketing that Obama has.
>
>I was leaning toward Richardson myself, but my brother, who lives in New Mexico, where Richardson is the gov, says he hasn't gotten anything done there. I also have concerns about his health, but it's all irrelevant now anyway.
>
>Tamar
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform