Now Sedna is administrated by the community, and a part of VFP-X.
YOU can participate on this, just dirty your hands, and help improving it or adapt Sedna to your needs.
>I agree, but it is not how it's perceived by the people I talk to. The point was to have a single platform (VFP9 SP2 SEDNA DBI CONTROLS) that others could extend without having to worry about future upgrades, now it has to be tweaked to work with a variety of configurations. You can use this if you have SP1, but not SP2 or viseaversa...
>
>So instead of having a single unified permanent structure to work with which would encourage the remaining users to consolidate (upgrade) to that stable platform, many will not upgrade, there will be a mismash of versions, vendors will have to support these inconsistancy.
>
>>>As it stands, I believe most users will not use SP2 or Sedna or the DBI controls, what a shame.
>>
>>I can understand why someone would not want to move to SP2, but I wouldn't group Sedna into the SP2 issues. Sedna is a different release that should work with SP1. Plus you get the source with Sedna so if you did find an issue you could fix it.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only