>>>>Honestly though, why do "people" need to be persuaded? This is Michel's sandbox, so it's his rules. He is the one that needs to be persuaded.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Agreed, and I primarily meant Michel. But he will probably take the views of members into consideration.
>>
>>Why the hell would he start doing that now?
>
>
>Why wouldn't he? I got the impression Michel banned John because enough members complained to him.

Michel banned him because he likely had some bad maple syrup on his crêpes for breakfast that day. He has never cared what anyone says. I respect that to some degree, but it is what it is.