I agree with you. I also think there are some Democrats who would (are) be more tough on that issue than some Republicans.



><g>
>
>Actually you bring up something that bugs me sometimes. There seems to be an assumption that liberals are pacifists and only conservatives can be "tough on terror." I disagree with that and consider it mainly a Republican political tactic to paint things that way. No one can say the current administration is not conservative, yet after 6.5 years of chasing Osama bin Laden he is still walking the earth and releasing taunting videos. We need to fight back against Al Qaeda. The disagreement is over tactics, namely Iraq. As someone once said, invading Iraq in response to 9/11 was about like it would have been to invade Spain in response to Pearl Harbor.
>
>
>>Who are you and what have you done with Mike? :o)
>>
>>
>>
>>>>A search is a direct breach of a sovereignty of a country. Are you assuming that guys in US uniforms are somehow within their jurisdiction? That them not being in a shock wave and coming in on airplanes, choppers, bombers and tanks somehow makes them look like a charity? The size of force doesn't change anything: you want the armed forces of one country to operate in another country, period.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Correct. I do.