>Huh ??? First you said it was not scientifical and know your claiming something that cannot be supported from the statistical analysis. The fact is that the majority did not vote for one or another reason.
>
>
>Walter,
>
>We have about 20 people who have officially replied right now, and the 'yes' votes outnumber the 'no' votes by about a factor of four. That's a large majority.
>
>Where are all these people who would represent the 'tens of thousands' of dollars' that Doug Hennig mentioned?

Do you know what the term "statistical significance" means ?? Do you know anything about a randomized selection out of a population ?? There is a reason to why in an election the % of voters do determine whether an election is valid.