Then he'll get hospitalized instead and then eventually released.
>>
>>I'm sure that's true, Bill. But there will always be cases where evidence is questionable, or even just circumstantial.
>>
>>But playing the averages is something unquestionably wrong when it comes to putting someone to death.
>>
>>And why is there such urgency to put to death a person who is guilty beyond ANY shadow of a doubt?
>>Would you go for a change that says the person is guilty (as found by trial and at least 1 appeal) and says he wants to be put to death can then be put to death?
>
>Actually, if he says he WANTS to be put to death - then he's insane and we can't execute him. No, don't look at me like that, that's the law - I don't get it either.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
