If the pot of money was endless, why shouldn't we give 1 million$ from it to each person on Earth?
The money would loose all it's power if it was unlimited. It's the basic principle of the demand and the offer.
So yes, a person always get richer on the back of another.
>Why should there be a limit? Talk like this suggests that there is a finite pot of money out there and if one person earns more money then another must make less. This is not the case. Unlike the cattle-futures market, the world economy is not a zero-sum game.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only