Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
A voting trick
Message
From
05/02/2008 18:47:11
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
Other
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01289482
Message ID:
01289862
Views:
19
That's got to be it! :o)


>No doubt about it. Maybe there were a lot of Patriots fans ;-)
>
>
>>We need no further proof that it is an election year. Reasonable discussions all go out the window! Duck! :o) Where is Tom's sarcasm when we need it? :o) I have noticed that everyone seems much more 'touchy' lately. Perhaps people are worried about the outcome of the elections? Or post-holiday stress maybe?
>>
>>
>>
>>>You are misrepresenting what I said -- willfully twisting it into the straw man you desire IMO. Please forgive me for bowing out of this discussion.
>>>
>>>
>>>>The way you've stated it IS inflammatory and gets to the core of what's so very wrong with the left's current view of government. The government is supposed to serve the needs of the citizens, your approach to taxation suggests that people serve the needs of the government.
>>>>
>>>>Our government is set to approve a budget worth 20% of our GDP. In addition, many believe that's not big enough. Now that's inflammatory!
>>>>
>>>>>It sounds inflammatory when you put it that way. All I meant was that in any society with taxation (which is all of them) no one gets to keep all their income. In that case, no, our money is not all ours.
>>>>>
>>>>>>"our money is not all rightfully ours"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>This is what I object to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I wouldn't call it sad so much as a fundamental difference in outlook. Please tell me which of these statements you disagree with (OK to choose more than one) --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>1. A government is necessary.
>>>>>>>2. A government requires money to run.
>>>>>>>3. The money has to come from the citizenry in one way or another.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If you don't disagree with any of those, I don't see how you make a case that we should be able to keep all our income.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't disagree with those statements, but that doesn't mean I should be taxed based on how much I earn. Sales taxes, corporate taxes, federal use fees, tariffs, etc can all be used without punishing people for successfully accumulating wealth. Wealth building through investment and savings should be encouraged.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>We are staring down the barrel of a $3.1 trillion budget. That's 20% of our GDP going to the government. Not to mention the time and money spent on accounting both personal and corporate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As I said before, please go out and vocally back the Dem candidate by repeating "our money is not all rightfully ours".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>No, our money is not all rightfully ours, not in any modern society. Not in mine, not in yours, not in Europe, etc. etc. etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This is just sad. I don't believe I have ever seen a greater argument for better economic education in this country than this one statement. Do me a favor. Regardless who wins the Dem primary, join their campaign and utter this phrase at every event you can attend.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*

010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform