Can you point out the "nasty, insulting, rhetoric" that Perry used? I don't see it. His statement was Ah, the
old "they haven't attacked us here since 9/11, so the war in Iraq must be proving something"

I don't see any insults in that.




>Homeland Security is a combination of many strategies Perry. At least if you are going to respond, give a thought-out valid argument, not nasty, insulting, rhetoric.
>
>
>>Ah, the old "they haven't attacked us here since 9/11, so the war in Iraq must be proving something".
>>
>>So sorry, but a 3rd grader understands the fallacy in that logic. There is no need to attack us here, because we are there. Our soldiers are dying everyday over there.
>>
>>>>If the US pulled out tomorrow Iraq would be a mess. It is a mess now, a mess we created thanks to this same type of BS. Smoking guns in the form of a mushroom cloud...
>>>>
>>>>What do you think would have happened if we did not invade in the first place? What will happen if we don;t invade parkistan, syria, north korea, ...? Clearly, we all will die unless we elect a republican.
>>>>
>>>>It is BS because Iraq is not the War on terror. Barack and Hillary do not support retreat and defeat. Regardless of who is elected we are leaving Iraq. A draft would not fly so it is the only option left. No one is talking about tomorrow. Everyone is taking about cleaning up as much of Bush's mess as possible. It is BS.
>>>>
>>>
>>>So we run and hide and blame Bush. And we let the same people who attacked us at home before (and haven't been able to for the last few years (wonder why?) go at it again, except this time they control Iraq, Afghanistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and are fully supported by Iran and Syria.
>>>
>>>And we'll whine and blame Bush and wonder who is going to help us. Maybe we can make a run on flags at KMart again if it is fashionable (and trash them a few weeks later like we did after 9/11). Then we whine and blame Bush again.
>>>
>>>That in a nutshell is the democratic plan.