Why design patterns are easier in dynamic languages
Divers
Thread ID:
01291156
Message ID:
01291156
Vues:
81
Kevin,
Since you took several occasions to slap me in the face with the 'absurd claim' that desing patterns are 'better' implemented in dynamic languages. I wan't to set this straight for once and for all. Please also direct this the to 'well known member who backed you up in this claim' so we can start a real technical discussion rather the ad-hominum attacks.
The information above is about a discussion of dynamic typed languages versus static typed languages (so e.g. VFP vs VB.NET). It even does not take into account yet that VFP is very strongly equipped with the tools to design them e.g.:
- Macros - EXECSCRIPT() - Storing meta data and even code in tables stored within the executable