>>>Naomi,
>>>
>>>"accidentally" find out that someone has twitted me?... I am sure that I am on some lists (twit filters) but I will never "accidentally" find out. For example, if I send someone a message and I don't hear from then I do not automatically conclude that I must be in their twit list. I don't even think about it. I bet KevinG would handle it the same way.
>>>
>>>Imagine if people who may have sent me or Alan Popow messages while were were laid-up for a long time concluded that each of us must have them on out twit lists!
>>>
>>>
>>You're missing the point here, Jim. There is a simple direct way to accidentally find it out - send a private message to the person who twitted you and you would receive a JavaScript message.
>
>I don't see "the point", Naomi. But then it is rare that I send a private to anyone.
>
>BUT... maybe that explains why I have had a few from you, trying to "accidentally" find out who has you twitted.
>
>No, I didn't try to send you a private to test it because I DON'T CARE if I am twitted or not.
Give her a break Jim. She only wants to demonstrate a fact to you.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
