>I wasn't aware I was on a "time-line" with you. You want to pay me for my time? That'd be a different story. I'll be happy to send you my rates.

I'll send you mine (in euro's). You're the one who brought this topic on again by responding to me. You did initiate this, not me.

>What 'problems' did the SPROC contain?

I already told you before. But you can think for yourself... figure it out. I'll be happy to send an invoice.

>Walter, I learn new stuff every day. And I read the links. As they say in Analysis 101, "so what???"

Good. Then at least you know you were wrong.

>As I said, if someone presents a realistic grounds/environment for comparison, I might be interested. (And by the way, your original statement was that design patterns were easier in VFP than in .NET)

Aren't VB.NET and C# static typed? I wonder why you don't seem to need evidence to slap me in the face with something that is wrong. A few of those links do explain why it matters and have examples in there.

Again, you're distracting from the subject...
Do you agree that my statment is not that 'absurd' (Given all the evidence) ??