>>>>>Naomi,
>>>>>
>>>>>"accidentally" find out that someone has twitted me?... I am sure that I am on some lists (twit filters) but I will never "accidentally" find out. For example, if I send someone a message and I don't hear from then I do not automatically conclude that I must be in their twit list. I don't even think about it. I bet KevinG would handle it the same way.
>>>>>
>>>>>Imagine if people who may have sent me or Alan Popow messages while were were laid-up for a long time concluded that each of us must have them on out twit lists!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>You're missing the point here, Jim. There is a simple direct way to accidentally find it out - send a private message to the person who twitted you and you would receive a JavaScript message.
>>>
>>>I don't see "the point", Naomi. But then it is rare that I send a private to anyone.
>>>
>>>BUT... maybe that explains why I have had a few from you, trying to "accidentally" find out who has you twitted.
>>>
>>>No, I didn't try to send you a private to test it because I DON'T CARE if I am twitted or not.
>>
>>Give her a break Jim. She only wants to demonstrate a fact to you.
>
>Sorry, Peter, but no "break" was needed. She expected everyone else to know about it because she knows about it????
>My bet - she has yet to ask MichelF to fix it.
>
>My other bet... she said the relationship with the former colleague who twitted her in real life has been repaired. I have my doubts.
This is not fair of you Jim.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
