>>>Sorry, Peter, but no "break" was needed. She expected everyone else to know about it because she knows about it????
>>>My bet - she has yet to ask MichelF to fix it.
>>>
>>
>>I wanted to demonstrate it to you, but you missed what I was actually trying to tell you. This is exactly my problem - inability to convey the message the way I see it.
>
>Naomi, I understood your message exactly as you wanted it to be understood. Perhaps it's an inability - or unwillingness - on the side of Jim in this case?!

No, Peter, I told her that I don't care. And then she admitted that she uses it when she hs a suspicion.

You are far far far far far too "picky" in your readings. For you, if it wasn't written, there's no possibility of your assuming correctly.



>
>
>>>My other bet... she said the relationship with the former colleague who twitted her in real life has been repaired. I have my doubts.
>>
>>Well, if you want I can give you his member ID in private. But I don't want you to doubt. I said it and it's a truth. We are back being friends and I can send him PMs any time I like.